Abbreviations.com Convert.net Definitions.net Quotes.net Synonyms.net USZip.net References.net
Bookmark & Share
 
Synonyms.net
Search for Synonyms:     
Browse Alphabetically:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z #
 random synonym 
Personalize Yedda, (And make Danny Happy)
People ask & answer about almost everything. Tell us what you're interested in... So we can personalize Yedda especially for you
I'm interested in:
Originated from
ArticleAlley

Hi.... could you please explain in detail the ...

hi.... could you please explain in detail the whole proof for divisibilty rule for 19


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

Posted Answers

 
Ian
67 helpful answers


Exact divisibility by 19
First recognise the lower multiples of 19 which are
 2,   3,   4,  5,    6,     7,    8,    9,    10,   11,   12
38, 57, 76, 95, 114, 133, 152, 171, 190, 209, 228
Rule to test for divisibility by 19
Multiply the last digit by 2 and add this to the number represented by the remaining digits. Repeat this until a multiple is recognised, (or not).
Example: Is 11628 divisible. by 19? Proceed like this
(7 x 2) >> 1164 >>> (8 x 2) >>> 117
                    14                             16 
                 1178                            133                  Yes
Discussion
Let the number to be divided be N = 10a + b. All integers may be written in this form. [e.g. 11628 = (10 x 1162) + 8 ]
The result produced after applying this rule once is a + 2b.
To demonstrate that this test for divisibility by 19 is valid in all cases, we need to show that
if a + 2b is a multiple of 19, then it follows that N = 10a + b must be also.
Proof:
If a + 2b is a multiple of 19, we may write
a + 2b = 19k                                        Multiply through by 10
10a + 20b = 19(10k)                             Deduct 19b from both sides
10a + b = 19(10k - b)
This expression makes it clear that
10a + b is also a multiple of 19                  (Q. E. D.)
I think this supplies what you asked for. If you are curious where the general form of the rule, (described below), originated, it is from the study of congruences in number theory.
Having shown that the rule is valid for the case of divisibility by 19, it is a simple matter to find a similar form of proof for any particular case of divisibility by a prime.
If you read on you will see how the appropriate number, (such as the number 2 for divisibility by 19 above), is chosen for each divisibility test.

General Divisibility Rule for any prime divisor p

 
Find the least multiple of prime p that ends in 9
Let n = [(least multiple of prime p that ends in 9 ) + 1]/10
Also record p - n. The results for a few primes below are given below.
There are two types of rule depending on whether n or p - n (see below), is smaller.
Type I; If p - n is smaller just multiply the last digit by p - n and subtract this from the rest of the number. Repeat until a multiple of p is recognised, or not.

Type II; If n is smaller just multiply the last digit by n and add this to the rest of the number. Repeat until a multiple of p is recognised, or not. The earlier example was type 1.

p         n          p - n
7         5            2
11       10           1
13        4            9
17        12          5
19         2          17
23          7          16
29          3          26
31         28           3
37         26          11
41          37          4
43          13         30
47           33         14
Here is an example of Type II, which uses p - n = 2
Example: Is 18788 divisible. by 7? Proceed like this
Multiply the last digit by 2 and subtract
(8 x 2) >> 1878 >>> (2 x 2) >>> 186  >>> 18
                  -16                           -4            -4                    

                1862                         182            14               Yes

I hope all this was helpful,
Regards - Ian

Posted 2009-10-20T22:56:52Z
Ian was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for ayan_2587? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

Math tables for multipication and division

do you have separate multipication and division tables for a 4th and 5th grader? Many thanks!
Submitted by Annette Tarantino   1 year ago.
  • viewed 98 times


Q:

Good Math Tutor Software?

What's the best software out there to LEARN math with for adults? I was in a car accident years ago and lost all but basic math ...
Submitted by kamikazekitty007   2 years ago.
  • viewed 818 times
Last answer posted 17 days ago by Aniston


Q:

Is there theoretical evidence behind the basics for multiplication of complex numbers?

When I learned that the product of two imaginary numbers became the negative of the real-factor equivalent product, I did not get ...
Submitted by frevelm   4 months ago.
  • viewed 144 times
Last answer posted 4 months ago by Ian



» More...

Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
Synonyms.net Q&A is powered by Yedda an AOL Company
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners
Home |  Add New Abbreviation |  Your List |  Tools |  Become an Editor |  Tell a Friend |  Links |  Awards |  Testimonials |  Press |  News |  APIs new! |  About
Copyright ©2004-2007 STANDS4 LLC. All rights reserved.  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us