I understand that you're quite militant in your views about smoking, but surely you realize that no mater what YOU think, the LAW make think otherwise. I'm sure you can see that the law doesn't regard firing weapons (or throwing anything out of your window, for that mater) the same way it regards smoking. If I fire my pistol on the street and hurt someone, I'm exposed to both civil action and criminal charges. If I smoke in the street, I'm exposed to none. The same goes to smoking in my own home as opposed to firing through my window.
The law's basic view is that it's reasonable for a person stand in his home by his window and smoke. It also regards firing your pistol through your window as unreasonable. Therefore, the first action does not expose you legally, while the second does.
Again, I'm sorry you don't like my answers, but you keep misunderstanding them for my VIEWS or GUESSES. I'm not telling you what I think is right or wrong in that respect. I'm just telling you what the legal status is. If you find my answers unreasonable you should take some sort of action to change the law. One way to change the law is to start some sort of public campaign for it. another is filing a legal action against your neighbors and hope that you can convince the court that your way of thinking us the right way to interpret the existing law.
I can tell you that there is a paragraph in the Israeli Tort Ordinance (par. 44(a)) that deals with interrupting one's reasonable use of his property. The paragraph is stating that if someone's behavior is interrupting your reasonable use of your real-estate property, considering the property's nature, designation and location, he is exposed to civil action. You can start there, but it is a very very weak claim. No reasonable court will interpret that paragraph as allowing it to issue an order preventing your neighbors from smoking without a more specific and literal legal basis. And you'll have to hope, also, that your judge is a non-smoker.