Abbreviations.com Convert.net Definitions.net Quotes.net Synonyms.net USZip.net References.net
Bookmark & Share
 
Synonyms.net
Search for Synonyms:     
Browse Alphabetically:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z #
 random synonym 
Personalize Yedda, (And make Danny Happy)
People ask & answer about almost everything. Tell us what you're interested in... So we can personalize Yedda especially for you
I'm interested in:

Is this the basis of dilemma?

1.Smoking causes heart disease.
In this, smoking is the cause and heart disease is the effect.
This statement relates a single cause with a single effect [single cause – single effect relation].

2.Exercise prevents heart disease.
In this, exercise is the cause and prevention of heart disease is the effect. This statement also relates a single cause with a single effect [single cause – single effect relation]. Almost every human statement (scientific/philosophical/idiotic/ nonsensical) relates a single cause to a single effect.

3.Suppose that Mrs. Shiva happened to be a chain smoker and a good athlete. What would be the fate of her heart?
In this case, more than one cause (smoking and exercise) act in combination. Is there scientific method to predict the effect when more than one cause act in combination? Alas, one would say that there is multivariate analysis!

Every human logic fails predict the effect (outcome) when more than one cause act in combination. This is the source of every dilemma and confusion!!!


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

3 Posted Answers
Order by

 
900 helpful answers

Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things.

I have never smoked, don't plan on smoking, and am proud to live in Minnesota where we have some of the strongest anti smoking laws.

Helpful?(1)
Rated as Best Answer
 
2442 helpful answers

 

 

Virgin explorer,

   If she smokes more than she exercises, then she will be prone to heart disease.

 
286 helpful answers

One can approximate the chance of an outcome by taking into account the various causes and assigning a weight to each one. The larger the number of causes and the accuracy of the weight of each cause the more accurate the prediction of the probable outcome. This is a statistical method.

A, therefore B is bad logic always.

Posted 2009-10-08T19:13:18Z
Lido was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for Virgin Explorer? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
Synonyms.net Q&A is powered by Yedda an AOL Company
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners
Home |  Add New Abbreviation |  Your List |  Tools |  Become an Editor |  Tell a Friend |  Links |  Awards |  Testimonials |  Press |  News |  APIs new! |  About
Copyright ©2004-2007 STANDS4 LLC. All rights reserved.  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us