Race, black, white, political correctness

No george is is called media bias .The inability of the media to write the truth .NBC CBS ABC

Judge, no rational person ever suggested that leftist media was anything but a high-pressure intensely racist propaganda machine.

The insane and prejudiced bias of the liberal media is an insult to the profession of journalism: ABC, CBS, CNN, and NBC have been up to their necks in leftist paranoia ever since they were discredited -- eight years ago. 

No one with any rational or sustainable values believes their inane leftist rants.

Sour leftists are still sulking that they didn't get hard-line totalitarian communist atrocity, yet.  These lunatics will not stop until they get Gulags here and they will be run exactly the way Stalin ran them -- if leftists get their insane, paranoid, blinkered little way.

Now, I will be the first to admit that one segment of our nation all voted for Obama: tombstones.

2/3 of the remainder were falsified voter registrations.  Any way you look at it, it is a major violation of anti racketeering laws.

Absolutely - it is "political correctness" - which is a TWIST in itself.

However, not reporting on "black-on-white" crime - happens everywhere - not just in the South.

There was a serious incident of a group of young blacks torturing a young white couple - raping them both, carving on them, removing body parts, chemical burns, before killing them - in a vicious attack like wild animals - that has yet to hit the media - but if the racial make-up were reversed it would be repeatedly broadcast - right up to the lethal injections.

It is absolutely a case of the leftist media ignoring any crime that is perpetrated by blacks on whites, orientals or anyone who is not black. As has been stated, if it was a case of white crime committed on blacks, every major mass media reporter would be all over it. It is just not politically correct to talk about or report black crimes. Naturally when you state facts as I have just stated them, it makes you a bigot or racist. It does not matter where the crime is committed. It is all the same. A good case in point was last night. I stated a fact about Barack Obama and I was immediately called a racist by a bleeding heart liberal on one of these web pages. I am so used to being called a racist here that I welcome it. If a liberal were to agree with me, I would think I am doing or saying something wrong.

 
"THIS WAS IN MY E-MAIL,FROM ONE OF OUR BEST POSTERS"
      "PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO READ, THANK YOU"
 
Good Morning Friends,

I take this recent statement by Dr. Charles Krathammer not as fact, but as a distinct possibility.

I am not sure how many of you are familiar with the Climate Change Meeting that will be occurring in December, (Copenhagen), and the potential ramifications on Americas Sovereignty? At this point I don't, but am trying to educate myself as to the possible outcomes. Why? Because it is really starting to assail my basic American sensibility. Sorry, but I kind of like what freedoms we still posses, and have this unnerving feeling that what this administration is trying to do with OUR country is simple. That is to Take us into economic parity with the rest of the developed nations. Instead of being number ONE, we shall be ONE of many.

Dr. Krathammers statement, or belief.

"Obama doesn't really see himself as President of the United States, but more as a ruler over the world.  He sees himself above it all, trying to orchestrate & coordinate various countries and their
agendas.  He sees moral equivalency in all cultures.  His apology tour in Germany and England was a prime example of how he sees America, as an imperialist nation that has been arrogant, rather than a great noble nation that has at times made errors.  This is the first President ever who has chastised our allies and appeased our enemies!"


With that thought in mind I have taken several sections of the proposed Global Climate Change Treaty and did a little cutting and pasting.
What you will notice is what I call a lot of multiple choice language. Depending on the choices taken, and the signatures adhered to, will basically determine what we as a once sovereign nation will contribute to the rest of the world. From what I can tell, if the proper wording is picked in the FILL IN THE BLANKS, we will be screwed.  You be the judge.


Here are some of the excerpts. Once again you be the judge.
When I filled in the most conservative blanks, guess what? Take the first paragraph and you fill in the blank and ask yourself, WHAT DOES THIS DO TO OUR ECONOMY? OUR JOBS? OUR WAY OF LIFE???
If you recall Bush would not sign the Kyoto Treaty that called for a 5% reduction of Carbon Emissions for the vast ramifications that would be felt by the U. S. Let me think. What do you thing a 75 % reduction would do, much less a 95% reduction.



[And [in the range of 75–85] [by at least 85] [by at least 90] [by more than 95] per cent
by 2050.]]
Alternative to subparagraph 31 (b):
[should transform their economies over the coming decades in order to collectively reduce their
greenhouse gas emissions by 80–95per cent by 2050 compared to 1990 levels.]
 
36. The new agreed post-2012 institutional arrangement and legal framework to be established for
the implementation, monitoring, reporting and verification of the global cooperative action for
mitigation, adaptation, technology and financing, should be set under the Convention. It should include a
financial mechanism and a facilitative mechanism drawn up to facilitate the design, adoption and
carrying out of public policies, as the prevailing instrument, to which the market rules and related
dynamics should be subordinate, in order to assure the full, effective and sustained implementation of the
Convention.
38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three
basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization
of which will include the following:
(a)
The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on
adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds
and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will
operate as such, as appropriate.
[[[Be legally binding, and] [Include] [legally-binding] provisions for ensuring the
compliance of Annex II Parties with their financial commitments to support enhanced
action on adaptation in developing countries] [Provisions for ensuring the compliance of
developed country Parties with their financial and technology transfer commitments shall
be legally binding];]
2. [National adaptation plans [are to be] [should be] [reviewed and] updated [every [three to] four
years] [with financial support from the Convention Adaptation Fund]. [Implementation of] national
[adaptation plans [and actions]] [adaptation planning processes] [should be ongoing and iterative, and
activities] [should be] [could be] [reported] [included] as part of a country’s national communication.]
23. [[To promote [[the] enabling [activities] [environments] [(policy, legislative and institutional)] to
support] [, enable and support the implementation of] adaptation action[s], [all Parties] [Parties] [all

 
 FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/INF.2
Page 35
 
developing country Parties [particularly low-lying and other small island countries, countries with low-
lying coastal, arid and semi-arid areas or areas liable to floods, drought and desertification, and
developing countries with fragile mountainous ecosystems]] [with financial support from the Convention
Adaptation Fund, technical support and capacity-building] [shall][should][may]:] [To promote the
enabling activities to enhance adaptation actions in all developing country Parties, the developed country
Parties should]:
 
At this point there are 200 pages of this piece of work. 


Does the Carbon Issue need to be addressed? Yes. Does Health Care need to be addressed. Yes.
How? In small, systematic increments that actually accomplish the ends to the mean. That don't disrupt our whole social and economic system at the insistence of our Presidents outlook on our FLAWED and unfair nation.


The question that I need to ask is very simple. Is this GCC treaty a means to Obama's true goal as suggested by Dr. Krathammer? How does this tie into Cap and Trade, Health Care, Compensation Control, Education, and all of the other radical changes that he is trying to enact?


I think that we are starting to see the larger picture now.


KEEP THE FAITH, and I think it is safe to say, KEEP UP THE FIGHT!

B. 
 

 
"THIS IS A FOLLOW-UP E-MAIL FROM ONE OF THE BEST"
"PLEASE TAKE THE FEW MINUTES TO VIEW AND READ"
 
Friends,
 
I wrote to you this weekend about what I had read in the Copenhagen World Treaty on climate change that is going to occur in December. 
 
 
WE as a nation are hearing virtually NOTHING about what is about to transpire. With all my heart, all my convictions, I believe that this is one agenda item on Obama's list of many, that will give you the change that we all have so desperately craved. RIGHT!! 


If allowed to happen, this will Fundamentally change America as we know it.


Please take 4 minutes of your time and listen to this video. Then you judge. 


The question is, "What can we do to stop this madness???"


B.


Thanks James for the information.





Click here: YouTube - Is Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty?
=

Mr. Wells - here is something that I think - has similar - "political correctness" problems:

Parties »

Land Deal Reached for Flight 93 Islamic Crescent Memorial Honoring 911 Victims




Just in time for 911, an agreement has been reached on land for Flight 93 memorial. The red crescent is a go. If it was to be a religious symbol, what could be more egregious? It should have been a cross.
Agreement reached on land for Flight 93 memorial

The federal government has reached final agreements with landowners to purchase 1,400 acres at the Flight 93 crash site in southwestern Pennsylvania yesterday, clearing the way for construction to begin on the 9/11 memorial park this fall.
The announcement means the government will not invoke eminent domain to seize the land, a prospect that was raised in the spring.
"The fields of western Pennsylvania, where the heroes of Flight 93 perished, are hallowed ground for a grateful nation," Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said at a news conference announcing the deal.
"Thanks to the collaborative efforts of the landowners, the Families of Flight 93 and the employees of the National Park Service, we have reached this important milestone in properly honoring the courage and sacrifice of the men and women who gave their lives that day."
Salazar said the property owners would be paid a total of $9.5 million.

Your infidel taxpayer dollars at work.

Negotiations between the Park Service and the property owners, which had dragged on for years, got a jumpstart this spring when Salazar and Sen. Arlen Specter (D., Pa.) traveled to Somerset County to meet with landowners and family members of the 40 passengers and crew aboard the ill-fated plane.
[...]
Both Specter, who in 2002 introduced the Flight 93 National Memorial Act, authorizing the Park Service to establish the memorial, and Sen. Bob Casey (D., Pa.) said they were pleased that after all the years of negotiations, park construction would finally move forward.
Specter and Casey have helped secure more than $18 million in federal funds for the 2,200-acre memorial, projected to cost $57 million.
Patrick White, vice president of the board of Families of Flight 93 and the group's point person on the real estate transactions, said he was relieved the process was over.
"It has been a long and detailed and at times seeming impossible task with the amount of issues and concerns to be addressed," said White, whose cousin Louis Nacke of New Hope was aboard Flight 93. "But with the support of folks in federal and state and local government, we were able to work in a public-private partnership to get funds and acquire land as quickly as humanly possible."
Acting Park Service director Dan Wenk said he expected real estate closings on the remaining properties to take place by mid-October and construction to begin immediately after the groundbreaking on Nov. 7.
Outrage over this clear Islamic symbolism forced the Memorial Project to agree to make changes, but all they did was slightly disguise the giant crescent: 
More information is available at  CrescentOfBetrayal.com).
His  position is simple: The planned Flight 93 Memorial is a terrorist memorial mosque. Not only does the giant crescent point to Mecca, but architect Paul Murdoch proves that this orientation is intentional by repeating it in the crescents of trees that surround the Tower of Voices part of the memorial. 
 
Not only does the giant crescent point to Mecca, but architect Paul Murdoch proves that this orientation is intentional by repeating it in the crescents of trees that surround the Tower of Voices part of the memorial. (Repeated Mecca-orientations demonstrated in this animation). We hosted an open design competition in time of war and literally invited the whole world to enter. Of course we should have expected that the enemy would enter, and try to win a memorial to their heroes instead of ours. Much harder to understand is the willful blindness of those who are charged with the memorialization of Flight 93, which is supposed to be the symbol of our woken vigilance.
    Every place where the terrorists are memorialized in the crescent design, they are placed in the symbolic Islamic heavens (the crescent and star parts of the design). Every place where the 40 heroes are memorialized, they are depicted as symbolically damned, cast out of the symbolic Islamic heavens. One example is in the Tower of Voices, where an Islamic shaped crescent soars in the sky above forty symbolic souls that literally dangle


 

Absolutely! unfortunately political correctness is just another means to discriminate.