Questions for evolution believers..

This will answer all of your questions. this is amazing  http://www.real-wishes.com

For one thing, all of the answers to your understandable questions are not yet fully known.We do know though,that these changes in species happened over millions of years.To address one of your examples,the long necks of giraffes--this is how the process works: at first,in  what became the giraffes, for instance  the animals lived longer if they had longer necks. At first, they ate what was available and over centuries and centuries, there were probably some animals who died out completely, some who became more like sheep and goats and some who became what we now know as llamas.      And some became very long necked and were  only eventually giraffes.

Splitting of cells even happened very slowly,so none of this was something one can count in a generation or two. And as you know, many mutations were by chance, or seemingly so because of changes in the earth, water and atmosphere. 

An animal didn't suddenly start reproducing or switching suddenly from a cold blooded to warm blooded creature.Because survival depended  on some changes--some happened slowly, some didn't.

Just as humans are taller and broader now than ever--it did not take a year or two of change.An example that is interesting to follow  though is  one that is of shoter generation,that of certain moths,that were one color ,and changed after several years to another--that was the new color of their environment.

This moth only lives for a very short time, so many generations can be observed in a few years time. As you say, no animal would sudenly be able to reproduce without another of its kind, nor would an animal suddenly be able to change it's DNA just "overnight".You're correct--it *doesn't* happen like that.there are fish and insects today that can reproduce and there is only one sex or--th--it can reproduce if there are 2 sexes, but one of the 2 are not available.That surely could have been millions of years ago as well.But--I'm really not arguing that most had that abiity.

What I understand is that eventually there were 2 of the same kind that  had evolved at the same time, and eventually mated.Before then ther were many differnt kinds that lived, still live and some that died  out,some long ago some not so long ago.(as in Dodo birds just for example).

I personally have no trouble beleiivng in God and evolution.I think God started it all,and is still all part of it.And we, humans, are all part of it all,as well.

I imagine that for God, time is not measured as it is by we humans anyway.:-) 

your questions are all reasonable and tending to want to be answerd.. but you see, the problem with eveolution is that it wouldd all lead back to one answer. which is.. it would need a "creator" people usually refer to this "creator"  as something has risen on its own. virtually its not possible to just suddenly form mass that would take 62 billion years to from.. what im saying is all thos e animals that would of died for some reason that is certain, didn't because of something holding its life support. and that standard is God. he represents all civilization. things are unexplainable for a reason, you might not believe in him or not have religion at all. im just trying to clarify things. not just to you but to all human kind. its hard to understand or comprehend.

if you take the time to go on youtube.com and look up case for a creator. it'll explain everything. trust me its not a waste of time. hope this helps out.

-Kat Cruz

I see no reason why the hand of God needs to be absent from the theory of evolution, or vice versa. Because it is true, the first life would have needed some kind of "spark" to get it going, whether that was the Creator's direct touch, or just the right elements in the right amounts, at the right time. We don't know what the spark was, and we probably never will.

I don't think there will ever be proof in the existence of God, just like I suppose there will never be solid proof for the theory of evolution. However, it is worth noting, that the theory of evolution is constantly being revised. It is by no means a scientific law, or truth. It is a Theory, one that has substantial evidence supporting it, and debunking in. But then again, so does the Theory of creationism.

I don't think the two theories need to be mutually exclusive. I see no reason why God didn't use evolution as his tool for creation. It certainly seems more plausable than the idea of God molding all of us out of the proverbial clay.