Abbreviations.com Convert.net Definitions.net Quotes.net Synonyms.net USZip.net References.net
Bookmark & Share
 
Synonyms.net
Search for Synonyms:     
Browse Alphabetically:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z #
 random synonym 
Personalize Yedda, (And make Danny Happy)
People ask & answer about almost everything. Tell us what you're interested in... So we can personalize Yedda especially for you
I'm interested in:

GOD  

FAMILY

SELF

COUNTRY

 

In that order!                                                                                      

Obama's War On Science.....If It Doesn't Agree With Us?

The Bush administration is at it again.  It is suppressing scientific views that run contrary to the administration's line.

NO, WAIT!  It's the Obama administration that is conducting a war on science.  It appears that the EPA has suppressed a report solely because it contradicted the president's belief in imminent catastrophe due to global warming.

Reports Declan McCullagh for CBS News :

The Environmental Protection Agency may have suppressed an internal report that was skeptical of claims about global warming, including whether carbon dioxide must be strictly regulated by the federal government, according to a series of newly disclosed e-mail messages. 

Less than two weeks before the agency formally submitted its pro-regulation recommendation to the White House, an EPA center director quashed a 98-page report that warned against making hasty "decisions based on a scientific hypothesis that does not appear to explain most of the available data."

Not only was the researcher's report not forwarded.  He was told to stop working on climate change and to instead update the agency's grants database.

This is all so confusing.  I thought we were living in the era of change, of openness, of liberalism and tolerance!


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

2 Posted Answers
Order by

 
285 helpful answers

The more I think about it the more skeptical I am that global warming (even if true) can be affected by what we do. All this hype about the imminent disaster that is coming is being used to justify more government control.

 
196 helpful answers

GOD  

FAMILY

SELF

COUNTRY

 

In that order!                                                                                      

Here is an analogy that is easy to elate to:

If all the carbon dioxide on the planet was worth $1,000,000,000, the man made carbon dioxide would be worth $37 !

There is more Argon in the atmosphere than man made carbon dioxide!

The plants REQUIRE carbon dioxide to grow and produce oxygen. Gee, and that is important because?

The reality is the global temperature has been decreasing for 10 plus years!

The REAL controlling factor of "global warming or global cooling" is the same  thing it has always been, the sun ,and its sunspot activity or lack of it! Just like they taught you way back in grade school!

Ask yourself this simple question,"When the entire earth was covered in ice over 2 miles thick, how many SUV's and coal plants were there, that caused the earth to heat up and melt all that ice?

Global warming is a fraud created by Al Gore and other environmental fanatics for one reason and one reason only!To make a buck ,and dictate to the world (this is a global fraud) what they can use for energy under the guise of global warming paranoia, while they sell them "carbon credits"!

This Cap and Trade is just the beginning. Obama will go to Copenhagen and tie the US to an asinine agreement with the Europeans which will destroy the American economy, while China and India will continue to be exempt!

For all of Bush's failings (and he had many) this was not one of them. He realized that as long as China and India were exempt, the only thing signing the KYOTO agreement would accomplish would be to hamstring American businesses.

This is why The Cap and Trade Bill must be killed in the Senate!

Posted 2009-07-01T01:15:18Z
Helpful?(1)
Rated as Best Answer

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for MarineReconDad? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

Why Would EPA Suppress Their Own Report On Global Warming? 10 Guesses

A top Republican senator has ordered an investigation into the Environmental Protection Agency's alleged suppression of a ...
Submitted by MarineReconDad   5 months ago.
  • viewed 191 times
Last answer posted 5 months ago by pinnie


Q:

Change You Can Believe In? NO! Politics and Business As Usual! Money For Power? Another Obama Lie!

Louis Susman has one thing in common with many of his predecessors nominated to be the U.S. ambassador to the United Kingdom ...
Submitted by MarineReconDad   6 months ago.
  • viewed 169 times
Last answer posted 6 months ago by stevor


Q:

You Have Been Warned ! The Obama Change Is Here ?

Over the past three months we have witnessed some truly amazing movements by the Obama administration. He has proposed more ...
Submitted by MarineReconDad   8 months ago.
  • viewed 105 times
Last answer posted 8 months ago by Penny



» More...

Explore Related Posts in Forums

Obama's EPA Plan to Cost Extra $1300 Per Car

Http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090519/...us_obama_autos Quote: : Article WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama's new fuel and emission standards for cars and trucks will save billions of barrels of oil important climate change conference sponsored by the Heartland Institute with more than 700

obama tells anti cap n trade epa scientists to shut it

To fight climate change, they were told to keep it to themselves. PRINTEMAILSHARE RECOMMEND Laurie years, and they know more about climate change than most politicians. But when the couple released and not those of the EPA. Their discussion paper and video on climate change solutions are online

EPA gets into Climate Change -- in a big way

Will give EPA far more responsibility than addressing climate change. It effectively will assign EPA... contribute to climate change, said in a statement that the EPA proposal "is based on shoddy science guarantee you that. In fact I think we're already screwed and climate change will get really nasty
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
Synonyms.net Q&A is powered by Yedda an AOL Company
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners
Home |  Add New Abbreviation |  Your List |  Tools |  Become an Editor |  Tell a Friend |  Links |  Awards |  Testimonials |  Press |  News |  APIs new! |  About
Copyright ©2004-2007 STANDS4 LLC. All rights reserved.  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us