Obama's Plan For Taking Over America's Hospitals ?

Hospitals, clinics already stressed.

County, State hospitals getting smart.

Law says must service all no matter what and illegal immigrants can have all services without any pay.

So State hospitals say OK can only give you appointment on thus and thus for surgery, they go to clinics, Speicalty Clinics, where people have appointments and then they get service.

Most of them uncircumsized, they get constrictures on penis, they get free circumcision via clinics and docs must accomodate.

Illegals bringing this Nation to it's knees.

Look it up, ask the pros, they will tell you, we have a problem and I tell you now, not going away. 

Now this idiot wants free dental for homeless.

Hell I gonna stop working and live in ditch under bridge.

Why not, free everything.  Oh wait, I am white and educated, crap man, guess gotta keep pluggin on or die.

Well perhaps death better than living under Obatty. 

When are we going to get rid of this Tyrannt??????

No guts no glory.

Hello MarineReconDad:

I'm an accountant who has worked for over ten years in the health care field and especially with large hospitals.

Just because a hospital or clinic services indigent (poor) clients does not mean they are not seeking reimbursement from either the state or federal government for these patients.  If these patients qualify for either medicaid or medicare, the hospital will be reimbursed.  It's just a matter of submitting the appropriate paperwork and getting them qualified.  In addition to these programs, there are other avenues in which hospitals can obtain "publicly funded taxpayers dollars" to reimburse them for "all or a portion" of their indigent patient costs.

I suspect the rationale for including these hospitals in this proposed program is that they are receiving federal and state dollars.  As long as they are accepting public funds, they can not expect to be exempted for the Obama administration's proposed program.  It would simply be "unfair" to other health care providers who are also receiving taxpayer dollars to do so.

Sincerely,

Gail Cooper

This was an answer to an open qestion, by another poster that is not here now, but look at how true the words still are........
I might add that this person is very well respected and has seen this all first hand.
We were built on Capitalism. 
You gonna crap your pants when you get Socialized medicine and the line will be so long you gonna sleep in it.
Lived in Third World sh*tholes and Europe.
You want it you got it, coming to America really soon, the government from birth to death do you part.
Revolution, Civil unrest, on the way.
Was written by a True Patriot that loves his country

A mugu on a mssion!  AGAIN.

meetze94

Hello, MRD:

Don't insult my intelligence.  I have worked with physicians and numerous other managers and administrators on both the clinical as well as the administrative side of health care.  Your question gives those who are uninformed the impression that private, denominational health care providers receive no reimbursement from state and federal governments for servicing indigent (poor) clients.  In fact, your most recent post confirmed all the points I made in my initial response to your question.

From the way your question is composed, you don't believe health care providers that fall into the category that you outlined should have to spend money in order to be in compliance just like all of the other health care providers when the new health care reform regulations go into effect.  MRD, in the real world, you usually can't have your cake and eat it too!

From what I understand, the proposed legislation is still in the "developmental stages" and if your organization has issues with it, they should be presented to the individuals in Congress who are reviewing health care reform.  I doubt seriously, if the average American who is financially struggling to provide for their families is overly concerned with your plight.  Realistically, you can't expect to receive taxpayer funded dollars and not fully comply with the necessary regulations.  From what I gather from your last post, your organization obviously needs them.

Sincerely,

Gail Cooper

Hello, MRD:

It seems to me that you are attempting to gather public support for your organization's plight by using the shortcomings of socialized medicine in the UK and Canada as scare tactics.  If improving our current health care system is really your intent, you do have the option of forwarding your objections to the parties in Washington, D.C. who are reviewing this matter.  Realistically, if you don't want any government oversight, don't accept government funding.  It's just that simple, however; I doubt seriously if you will be able to operate without it.

I sincerely believe that the U.S. can devise a health care system that will work for the overall benefit of the greater good of the American public.  You really should stop rattling that tired "socialized medicine failure Sabre" and become part of the solution.  Thank GOD we have these systems to serve as examples of what works and what does not work.

Sincerely,

Gail Cooper