|
|
Mat. 6:33 "Seek Ye First the Kingdom of God and All these things Shall Be Added to You!!!
We as Americans have developed a "Savior Complex" towards our neighbors. We the People (seperate from Corporations) want the World to have Peaceful existance as we generally enjoy. We are known for pulling for the "Under Dog" & can get quite "Emotional" over what others take as "Everyday Life". Being Attacked on 911 threw us in the middle of an ANCIENT Struggle & "Way of Life" of which we had NO CLUE!!! This IS a Situation as Extreme as the Land itself! These people will Kill U as soon as look at U for their "Religion"! Their infighting has been for centuries & they are virtually still Living back in that time! There is an OOOOOLD song that asks the Question: "How ya gonna keep 'em down on the Farm after they've seen "Parri" (Paris)" from the WWI era. And now that they have been "Innundated" by the "West" they have & are "Activly Spawning" Terrorist Cells designed to gain Power & Overthrow the West & Any Opposition to them!!! We have never come up against such a Concerted Effort & it Scares a lot of people who are Ignorant on just how to handle it. In simplest terms, the object of War is to (By Force) cause the Opposition to Submit & Cease Hostilities. This can be accomplished "In Country" easier than around the World wherever the Terrorist strike. If everyone pulls out of Iraq, it would be less than 6 months before Civil War was on Full Scale!!! It would be "Ripe" for Invasion by Iran & open up Israel for Invasion. I would Love to see U.S. bring back ALL our Troops from any Un-Friendly Country, but it would also mean Withdrawl of ALL our Corporate Interests because we could no longer Protect them. At that Time ALL the "Bleeding Hearts" would "SCREAM" at the Increased Price & Un-Availability of commonplace Items of everyday Life. I'm Affraid however, what is going to happen will result in Obummer withdrawing our Troops only to see him "Farm Them Out" to a "One World Fighting Force" (U.N. style) under International Control!!! Now, bear in mind what a "Wonderful" job the "U.N. Security & Peace Keeping Forces" have done around the World!!! LOL LOL Be Affraid, be Verry Affraid & be Prepared however U feel necessary to protect Urself & Family!!! Hope that helps? At this point I usually say: "Enjoy!!!" But the answer doesn't warrant much to rejoice in, sorry. John
Posted 2009-05-20T00:43:16Z
News Views's (deleted account) question
Moosemose was
invited by Yedda to answer this question.

When you post your question to Yedda, Yedda searches on your behalf for people with relevant knowledge and interests, who might know the answer to your question, and invites them to answer it.
The search for people who can answer your question continues for as long as needed - until you find the answer you were looking for.
When an answer is posted by someone who was invited (byYedda or by yourself) to answer your question, their answer is marked with a yellow "invited by Yedda".
To be invited to answer other people's questions in your areas of knowledge and interest, be sure to list your favorite topics:
» My Settings My Topics.
Of course, the more helpful your answers are, the more likely you are to be invited to future questions...
|
Your direction,not your intention,determines your destination
I'm afraid this is one of his pipe dreams.Without our troops this country and others would be doomed.We have to have troops to protect us ,and ours or eventually everyone will be trying to take us over in a heart beat. Without military law and order no country would be safe.I had 6 uncles that were in World WarII and I never heard a word about regreting it and the part they all played. The Bible says"there will be wars and rumors of wars", if this is true and it is as we can see what is going on around us, we certainly need troops that are ready. Maybe Obama is going to figure a way where he will be able to stop wars and rifts and have his own personal troops. I'm afraid if things continue on the track it's going, we will have riots and fghting here on a large scale. Hope I'm wrong.
Posted 2009-05-21T08:55:21Z
News Views's (deleted account) question
A Brown was
invited by Yedda to answer this question.

When you post your question to Yedda, Yedda searches on your behalf for people with relevant knowledge and interests, who might know the answer to your question, and invites them to answer it.
The search for people who can answer your question continues for as long as needed - until you find the answer you were looking for.
When an answer is posted by someone who was invited (byYedda or by yourself) to answer your question, their answer is marked with a yellow "invited by Yedda".
To be invited to answer other people's questions in your areas of knowledge and interest, be sure to list your favorite topics:
» My Settings My Topics.
Of course, the more helpful your answers are, the more likely you are to be invited to future questions...
|
One can search every facet of the Universe, but unless one carries that which one is searching for with them, they find it not.
Obama who ignorantly committed himself to pulling the troops out of Iraq and then becomes president and wants to cut military spending at a time the Middle East is overflowing with turmoil will not get my vote for being wise. This is a president who was voted in by the hip hop generation and ignorant manipulated Americans who bought into the Bush bashing from and bias media. Regardless of weapons not being found in Iraq the fact is evident that they are in the Middle East. The Middle East nuclear arsenal is on the rise and developing, this added to the madness of Iran and disarray of Pakistan and the growing military in China and Russia among others I can definitely say NO, America is not more safe. But I regress, because that question is meant to read “are we more safe from terrorist?”. After they just arrested 4 men who had plans to bomb some temple in NY who were recruited from an American prison and convert into Moslems and then grow to be terrorist coupled with Obamas desire to house enemy combatants in America regardless of what America wants, I can give another unquestionable NO, America is not more safe.
Posted 2009-05-22T18:52:38Z
News Views's (deleted account) question
jameslee102447 was
invited by Yedda to answer this question.

When you post your question to Yedda, Yedda searches on your behalf for people with relevant knowledge and interests, who might know the answer to your question, and invites them to answer it.
The search for people who can answer your question continues for as long as needed - until you find the answer you were looking for.
When an answer is posted by someone who was invited (byYedda or by yourself) to answer your question, their answer is marked with a yellow "invited by Yedda".
To be invited to answer other people's questions in your areas of knowledge and interest, be sure to list your favorite topics:
» My Settings My Topics.
Of course, the more helpful your answers are, the more likely you are to be invited to future questions...
|
Pakistan Is Rapidly Adding Nuclear Arms, U.S. Says - NYTimes.com
May 18, 2009 ... Pakistan Is Rapidly Adding Nuclear Arms, U.S. Says .... Mullen about public reports “that Pakistan is, at the moment, increasing its nuclear ... www.nytimes.com/2009/05/18/world/asia/18nuke.htm
Posted 2009-06-11T01:22:18Z
News Views's (deleted account) question
|
One can search every facet of the Universe, but unless one carries that which one is searching for with them, they find it not.
Obama is looking more and more like he is giving a concentrated effort to lose this war. He spends more money in history then all our presidents. Now we are in a time when the Middle East is overflowing with turmoil. Middle East nuclear arsenals rising and developing and this coupled with Iran and N. Korea out of control, Pakistan in disarray and the growing military in China, Russia, and N. Korea among others, and this President cuts military spending in America. Does that make any sense? And now he orders that the Miranda Rights be read to terrorist. Is this a war of a police action? And so you can get a good picture of what these terrorist rights are, please read.
Miranda Rights:
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at government expense.
They have more rights given to them by America then they get from their own government.
And what kind of message does this send to our combat troops? This president is defeating all war efforts and destroying our country.
Posted 2009-06-11T15:25:54Z
News Views's (deleted account) question
jameslee102447 was
invited by Yedda to answer this question.

When you post your question to Yedda, Yedda searches on your behalf for people with relevant knowledge and interests, who might know the answer to your question, and invites them to answer it.
The search for people who can answer your question continues for as long as needed - until you find the answer you were looking for.
When an answer is posted by someone who was invited (byYedda or by yourself) to answer your question, their answer is marked with a yellow "invited by Yedda".
To be invited to answer other people's questions in your areas of knowledge and interest, be sure to list your favorite topics:
» My Settings My Topics.
Of course, the more helpful your answers are, the more likely you are to be invited to future questions...
|
Boycott David Letterman. Please pass this on.
h/t to Conservatives4Palin for putting this together, with thanks to all who will continue to update on this thread with the contact info for all LOCAL Letterman advertisers across the country. The smaller advertisers in the local market must also be held accountable for supporting a program that thinks raping 14-year-old girls is funny.
Tell the following four companies you will no longer be patronizing them so long as they continue to advertise on Letterman:
Mars Candy (click for address and C-suite names)
The Olive Garden (click for address and full list of C-suite execs at Darden Restaurant group, owners of Olive Garden)
Kellogg’s (click for address and full list of C-suite execs)
Hellmann’s Mayonnaise
We’ll have better results if we focus all our might on the four above, but here are other advertisers of David Letterman as well:
eBay
Intel
Lexus
TV.Com
On the Border Restaurants
CBSsports.com
JohnFreida.com
DiTech
Earn My Degree
True Credit by Trans Union
Bowflex
CBS Contact Info: (212) 975-4321
CBS Executives:
Nina Tassler = nina.tassler@cbs.com
Kelly Kahl = kelly.kahl@cbs.com
Kim Sartori = kim.sartori@cbs.com
Les Moonves = lmoonves@cbs.com
Reason: remember when Michael Phelps was caught with his marijuana bong? Kellogg’s cereal dropped him like a hot potato because its brand image is child-focused for most of its products. Speedo won’t ever drop Phelps, no matter what he does, but we doubt he’ll ever have his face on a McDonald’s happy meal again either.
No candy company will want to be associate with raping 14 year-olds.
No restaurant chain like Olive Garden will want to be consistently Googled with statutory rape.
Kelloggs won’t want to be involved in another messy advertising relationship after Phelps.
A concerted effort against family-friendly advertisers of Letterman will work, but it will require persistence.
“M&Ms: the candy for people who think rape is super funn!”
“Eat at Olive Garden so you can laugh about rape while eating unlimited salad and breadsticks!”
“Kelloggs: the breakfast cereal for misogynists and perverts who exploit minor children!”
Now, this should have brand managers racing for the phone if a focus and spirited effort is directed at hammering them each and every day until their ads stop appearing on Letterman’s show and website.
In this economy, a loss of three big advertisers like that will indeed be noticed by CBS.
UPDATE #2: Some advertisers, such as Best Western, are claiming they do not advertise on Late Night with David Letterman. This is apocryphal: Best Western buys banner ad space on CBS.com, and these ads appear on CBS.com when you click on the David Letterman page on that site. Best Western, Aerosoles, Paramount’s new Star Trek movie, and other banner ads pop up on every page of David Letterman’s site. This is paid advertising Best Western and these other companies CHOOSE to buy from CBS.
If you are an advertiser upset people who despise rape and refuse to allow Letterman to get away with promoting the rape of minors in New York, then you need to get on the phone to your ad buy account execs and yank your web ads from CBS.com.
No one believes you do not have the power to do this. If Best Western has agents who can post here, then you have agents who can call your advertising firms and stop giving your money to CBS and David Letterman.
It was consistently reported that WILLOW Palin, 14 years old, was in New York, attending events with her mother. Not 18 year old Bristol.
There is NO EXCUSE for Letterman and his writers to “make the mistake” of attacking “the wrong” Palin daughter.
None.
Just as there is no excuse for Best Western or any other advertiser to justify their support for Letterman by claiming, “we only buy ads online, not on TV”.
Posted 2009-06-12T03:17:55Z
News Views's (deleted account) question
|
Posted 2009-06-13T12:55:56Z
News Views's (deleted account) question
|
New Party
Co-founded in 1992 by Daniel Cantor (a former staffer for Jesse Jackson's 1988 presidential campaign) and Joel Rogers (a sociology and law professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison), the New Party was a Marxist political coalition whoseobjective was to endorse and elect leftist public officials -- most often Democrats. The New Party’s short-term objective was to move the Democratic Party leftward, thereby setting the stage for the eventual rise of new Marxist third party.
Most New Party members hailed from the Democratic Socialists of America and the militant organization ACORN. The party’s Chicago chapter also included a large contingent from the Committees of Correspondence, a Marxist coalition of former Maoists, Trotskyists, and Communist Party USA members.
In 1995 Barack Obama sought the New Party’s endorsement for his 1996 state senate run. He was successful in obtaining that endorsement, and he used a number of New Party volunteers as campaign workers.
To view a comprehensive profile and some supplemental resources about the New Party, click here.
Posted 2009-06-15T09:54:57Z
News Views's (deleted account) question
|
|
|