Several talk-radio hosts have discussed the overtly pro-Muslim (and even anti-American) remarks in the text of [Alleged] President Barack Obama earlier today in Cairo. But, so far, even some of the heavy-hitters of the talk-radio world have avoided analyzing the "code-speak" contained in his landmark speech. This column seeks to help average Americans to understand the hidden meanings that Obama has conveyed -- on our behalf -- to the Muslim world.
For those that do not already know, there is prophetic meaning to Obama's name. It is especially important to note that his family name means "crooked". Yes, you read correctly. (For the details, click this link.)
http://tomkovach.us/Columns/Crossbow/080723--Obama_name_means.html
Those that use symbols and code-speak to advance hidden agendas utilize a variety of methods. Under the Muslim philosophy of taq'qiyah ("holy" deception), it is quite acceptable for a Muslim to mislead and lie in order to advance the cause of Islam. Some people, especially those with a strong Bible-based faith, have difficulty with the thought of needing to de-code the speech of an elected official. Because those people would not lie, they assume that others believe likewise. Crooked politicians use that situation to their advantage. It is important for all Americans to realize that corrupt officials like to "hide in plain sight" with regard to their subversive agendas.
Location, location, location
Not one of the talk-radio hosts that I heard today mentioned the significance of the location of Obama's speech. Before the Usurper-in-Chief even uttered a word, he was already sending a major signal to the Muslim world. And, that signal spelled danger for Israel . How? Read on.
There is a group that is dedicated to the destruction of Israel. (Actually, there are many Muslim groups with that goal, but one stands out.) That group is called The Muslim Brotherhood. (In Arabic, they are simply called al-ikhwan -- The Brotherhood.) The group was formed in 1928 by Hassan al-Banna, a teacher in Cairo. The school where he taught was Dar al-Ulum. Dar al-Ulum was founded in 1871 to, among other things, counter the growing influence of Christian missionaries from Europe. And, as time went on, Dar al-Ulum was eventually incorporated into Cairo University.
So, by choosing Cairo University as the location for his "apology tour" (a term coined by talk-radio giant Phil Valentine) speech to the Muslim world, there is a tacit endorsement of the Muslim Brotherhood. That would be the signal understood by most Muslims -- especially the heads of states -- around the world. It is important to note that the Muslim Brotherhood made a treaty with Adolf Hitler to assist in destroying as many Jews as possible. (The History Channel has done some fascinating presentations on the link between Hitler and the Muslim Brotherhood. Click the link for one of the videos.)
http://www.amazon.com/Brotherhood-Terror-History-Channel/dp/B000NDIAVA%3FSubscriptionId=10YVF75G6G1XD1C83E82&tag=tvguideonli02-20&linkCode=sp1&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=B000NDIAVA
And, lest anyone think that the selection of Cairo University was merely a coincidence, representatives of the Muslim Brotherhood were specifically invited to the speech.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/03/muslim-brotherhood-members-attend-obamas-cairo-speech/
What kind of solution?!
During a recent interview on Israel National Radio, hostess Tamar Yonah told me that the "two-state solution" carries the nickname The Final Solution over there. The fact that Obama's speech was adamant in its support of a "two-state solution" carries even more weight when considered in light of the Muslim Brotherhood connection. And, the principle of taq'qiyah was invoked when Obama used double-speak (in paragraph 32) to make the phony claim that "the Palestinian people" includes both Muslims and Christians. The reality is that the Arabic word for Palestinian is transliterated Filistin . Yes, the same Philistines that are described in the Holy Bible as the ancient enemies of Israel. And, yes, their capital city is still in Gaza.
Many of the Arab Muslims that live in the so-called Palestinian territory are, or have descended from, the societal rejects of the surrounding Muslim countries. After the founding of the State of Israel, those other countries used their national resources to send less-desirable residents to infiltrate Israel and populate it with dissidents and revolutionaries. (This is similar to the 1979 "Mariel boatlift", when Fidel Castro culled felons from prisons and insane from asylums and put them into rafts headed for the Florida coast.) Simultaneously, those countries also persecuted a group of Jews called the Mizrahim (Hebrew for "Easterners") -- those that live in the ancient Jewish enclaves of the various regions of the Diaspora. Some of those enclaves have existed since shortly after the Babylonian sacking of Jerusalem. The news media, the United Nations, and lazy elected officials totally overlook the persecution of the Mizrahim when discussing Middle East policy. While making noise about the plight of a non-existent group (there is no ethnic or linguistic difference between a so-called "Palestinian" and any other Arab in that part of the world), Congressmen ignore the confiscation of family businesses from Mizrahim in various countries.
Obama's advocacy of a "two-state solution" overlooks many factors. Besides the right of Israel to self-govern and to be secure within her borders, there is the clear Biblical mandate to support Israel. (Genesis 12:3) Instead, Obama plainly declared, "It is time for these settlements to stop." The traditional American viewpoint is to avoid meddling in the internal affairs of other countries. This should be doubly true regarding a country where God drew the borders! There is also the common-sense problem that Obama's intentions to support the Philistines goes against the desires of the majority of American citizens. But, why should the desires of the majority matter to a man that occupies the White House in violation of the Constitution?
In the name of ... who ?!
In paragraph 41, the alleged president used a linguistic slide into dangerous territory. He referred to a future time when, "... the Holy Land of three great faiths is the place of peace that God intended it to be." The implication of that clause, and of the paragraph that surrounds it, is that Jews, Christians, and Muslims all worship and pray to the same being. They do not. (And, if they do, then why do the Muslims try to kill their "brothers"? And, why do they describe Christians and Jews as "apes and pigs"?) The idea that Allah could be the same as the God of the Bible is preposterous. The proofs are too numerous for this author to describe in a political column.
But, for those that are familiar with the Holy Bible, consider what Obama said about "peace and security" in the 33rd paragraph of his speech. Compare that to Isaiah 59:8 (remember, his name means "crooked"), Jeremiah 6:14, and 1st Thessalonians 5:3. Perhaps the "sudden destruction" that comes upon those that falsely proclaim peace and safety will be the War of Gog and Magog that was predicted by the Prophet Ezekiel. (For more on that, click this link for a column by Tamar Yonah.)
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Blogs/Message.aspx/2477
more code-speak
It is important to note that Obama's speech was specifically divided into seven parts, and that he emphasized that number of divisions. In the Muslim faith, there are "seven pillars of Islam". The final division of Obama's speech was about economic prosperity. The final pillar of Islam is jihad ("holy" war). A few years ago, President Mahmoud Ahmedi-Nejad announced the creation of the Iranian Oil Bourse as a means to use the petroleum market to undermine the dollar and destroy the United States. (For a detailed analysis of the concept of economic warfare, see the book The Hundred-Years War , and then consider whether Japan might have been the real winner of World War Two!)
Given that Obama has been announcing for the past several months that he desired to give this speech, can anyone think that he picked this pattern and parallel by mere coincidence? The point becomes stronger when considered alongside the fact that Obama's own White House staff has stated that he is "getting in touch with his inner Muslim", even though Obama claims to be a Christian. (Tellingly, the only mention of Jesus by name was in a fictional story that Jesus joined in prayer with Muhammed. A devout Christian would consider such a story to be strong blasphemy.)
This analysis barely scratches the surface of the hidden messages that Obama conveyed to the Muslim world on behalf of all Americans. But, this brief view should be enough to give even non-religious citizens reason to beware of the Chameleon-in-Chief.
reprinted from American Independent Party National Committee
