Muslim block trying to block discussions of the truth as to islam's totalitarian, supremist ideology and call for violent conquering of the entire ...

Is there a question here?  Is there room for discussion with this post?  Or is this just another fine example of ignorant people abusing the voice the world wide web gives them?

Quirinnious. Please learn. What is Dar al Islam? It is the House of Submission (that part of the World that is submitted to the Islamic rule). What is Dar al Harb? It is the House of War (the rest of the World). What are the Harbies? The inhabitants of the Dar al Harb, who have no rights whatsoever, not even the right to live. The jihad is the "holy" war of the Dar al Islam against the "infidels" of the Dar al Harb. Don't you think that we should be grateful to the World Wide Web for keeping us informed about the dangerous ideology of  Islam?

There is a ton of dangerous ideology out there.  Most of which finds its home in religions.  Christians and Jews have a similar view about the other Abrahamic

religions.  It is very easy to taint a perspective based on where you live.  If it is the United States, then you live in a predominantly Christian country with allegiance to Israel and an outlandishly low Islamic population.  That is why the U.S. more than any other country is a target of Al-Qaeda.  I'm assuming that at some level of consciousness, all Americans are aware of this.  Another thing that they are probably aware of is that their homeland could suffer another devastating attack at anytime.  Do keep this in mind when evaluating our social landscape especially against the rest of the world.

As i watched days go by in Iraq wondering if I would ever see my wife and children again, I took note of the things around me. The people we are fighting are nothing more than cowards. Let me elaborate... where I come from we confront our problems head on.... eye to eye like a man. If I have an aught against anyone I take it to them personally, I don't set a bomb to kill them because I don't have the testicular fortitude to face them, i don't cover my face to attack them from afar and hide like a child, I don't send ignorant boys to hijack a plane and cowardly crash it to fit an agenda. If Osama believes the crap that comes out of his mouth then why doesn't he be a man and claim the seventy virgins for himself, I would be obliged to send him to meet them. We have to stand up to our own POTUS and regain our own backbone and refuse to bow down to the true infidels.... the radical muslims that are too ignorant to see the reality of their eventual demise. We are strong, we are Americans... let us not forget our purpose. I will never bow to anyone but the one true GOD. Holla Allah, you are messing with the wrong country

Qurinnious: "It is very easy to taint a perspective based on where you live.  If it is the United States, then you live in a predominantly Christian country with allegiance to Israel and an outlandishly low Islamic population.  That is why the U.S. more than any other country is a target of Al-Qaeda.  I'm assuming that at some level of consciousness, all Americans are aware of this.  Another thing that they are probably aware of is that their homeland could suffer another devastating attack at anytime.  Do keep this in mind when evaluating our social landscape especially against the rest of the world."

1

Anyone with a basic understanding of militant Islam knows that selling out Israel will only hasten the complete Islamisation of the middle east and bring militant Islam knocking on the door of Europe once again.

There is no difference between Islamic terrorism in Thailand, the Philippines, India or Israel. The conflicts are all connected to the dream of a caliphate and eventually "all lands under Allah".

2.
Amicable ties between the Islamic and non-Islamic world are contrary to Islamic theology. In Islam, the only acceptable relationship with non-Muslims (other than conversion to Islam) is one of complete subservience to Islam.

Non-Muslims cannot achieve any genuinely amicable relationship with the Islamic world. The only possible relationship is one that is temporary, and in which the Islamic world keeps the non-Islamic world at arm's length. President Obama cannot change this.

3.
Obama's speech was lofty, rich and stirring. It will provoke discussions. It smacks of well-written paper.

That is all. All will remain the same or even get worse. Even if Obama throws Israel under the bus, militant Islam will not be appeased.

 

1. A middle east with a united Palestine instead of Israel isn’t much more “Islamified” than it currently is.  There will still be Christians and Jews there as there have been for the last thousand years.

…bring militant Islam knocking on the door of Europe once again.

How?  You make it seem like the entire focus of the Islamic world is Israel and when these guys are done with Israel they are just going to be chillin’ playing Xbox 360 and Parcheesi until one day BAM! Ahmed walks in with a duffel bag and says, “Road trip!  We will be blowing ourselves up in Greece from now on!”  Islam is already established in most parts of Europe and there isn’t a big insurgency.  Why?  Well (and this is just a theory) people aren’t willing to go on suicide missions when there isn’t anything to kill themselves over-like maybe being occupied for hundreds of years, or being driven from your homeland and forced to live in deplorable refugee camps, or having to live your entire life in a war zone, or knowing that you are demonized most everywhere in the world.

There is no difference between Islamic terrorism in Thailand, the Philippines, India or Israel. The conflicts are all connected to the dream of a caliphate and eventually "all lands under Allah".

There is a big difference between these localized problems and of course they are all connected to the dream of a caliphate and eventually "all lands under Allah" otherwise they would not be considered ISLAMIC terrorism.  It’s similar to the myriad examples of Christianity’s insurgency and terrorism which although differ in global position have similar aims.

2.      Islam deeply stresses not being influenced by hypocrites for fear of being tainted in a similar way to Christianity’s homophobia.

If we look to the actions of the majority of Muslims for precedents of future Islamic action we find a group of people who want peace and want a solution to injustice and will welcome a stranger.  There are, however, those in the Middle East that are extremist and hell-bent on causing problems for the west who caused them problems until, somehow, they think the problems will be resolved.  It should be noted that these people are mainly in government or a terrorist organization.

What President Obama is trying to do may eventually work.  We are engaged in a celestial war, a country fighting a contrived religious ideal-jihad.  To win we must promote democracy.  This is not the first time the U.S. has tried its hand at a peaceful Mid-east.  A notable attempt was Carters Camp David Accords.  Of course Anwar Sadat was assassinated most likely because he signed the accord.

Qurinnious:"Well (and this is just a theory) people aren’t willing to go on suicide missions when there isn’t anything to kill themselves over-like maybe being occupied for hundreds of years, or being driven from your homeland and forced to live in deplorable refugee camps, or having to live your entire life in a war zone, or knowing that you are demonized most everywhere in the world."

harry: more Europeans were driven out of their homelands (e.g. the Sudetes) and more Jews were driven out of their Arab homelands than Muslims of theirs. But these Europeans or Jews were not kept in miserable refugee camps by their brother human beings. Keeping their brothers in refugee camps under the most miserable conditions is a purely Islamic practice.

No it isn't and I didn't say it was.  It should be noted however that the resistance was largely the same for all examples and consistent with today.