Abbreviations.com Convert.net Definitions.net Quotes.net Synonyms.net USZip.net References.net
Bookmark & Share
 
Synonyms.net
Search for Synonyms:     
Browse Alphabetically:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z #
 random synonym 
Personalize Yedda, (And make Danny Happy)
People ask & answer about almost everything. Tell us what you're interested in... So we can personalize Yedda especially for you
I'm interested in:
Originated from
Jpost

Mousavi: People are entitled to protest fraud and lies

President Obama soft tone and silence about the crime being committed against the Iranian opposition, witch is fighting to get a Democratic Government, indicates The He supports and protect Mr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Once

Mr. Ahmadinejad is kick out of power many more Dictators to be will follow like Hugo Chavez, Correa from Ecuador, Evo Morales from Bolivia. Syria most be watching the situation very closely. Now is the moment to speak up, tomorrow may be to late. Once Mr. Ahmadinejad and his regimen is gone forever, there will be peace in the Middle East.


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

2 Posted Answers
Order by

 
974 helpful answers

Be Blessed.

Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity (Love), I am become as a sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.

Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vauneth not itself, is not puffed up, Doth not behave itself unseemly, seekth not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil; Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in truth; Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things. Charity never faileth.

And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is (Love) charity.  

President Obama is not trying to protect Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Just because he keeps a cool head and is not one of those Politicians who runs into a situation blindly does not mean that he is not handling his business. Even Henry Kissinger has said that the President is taking the right tone.
 
  http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/18/kissinger-obama-iran/

 

In an interview with CNN yesterday, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) criticized President Obama’s approach to the turmoil in Iran, saying that he shouldn’t be concerned about being seen as “meddling” in Iran’s affairs. But on Fox News last night, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, noting that he was a McCain supporter, said that he thinks “the president has handled this well”:

KISSINGER: Well, you know, I was a McCain supporter and — but I think the president has handled this well. Anything that the United States says that puts us totally behind one of the contenders, behind Mousavi, would be a handicap for that person. And I think it’s the proper position to take that the people of Iran have to make that decision.

Of course, we have to state our fundamental convictions of freedom of speech, free elections, and I don’t see how President Obama could say less than he has, and even that is considered intolerable meddling. He has, after all, carefully stayed away from saying things that seem to support one side or the other. And I think it was the right thing to do because public support for the opposition would only be used by the — by Ahmadinejad — if I can ever learn his name properly — against Mousavi.

  

Watch it:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meugtwz6r0E

 

Kissinger isn’t the only prominent conservative to push back against McCain and the neocons. On Tuesday, Sen. Richard Lugar (R-IN), the ranking Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee, said that “for us to become heavily involved in the election at this point is to give the clergy an opportunity to have an enemy…and to use us, really, to retain their power.” Other Republican senators, including Sens. Mel Martinez (R-FL), Bob Corker (R-TN) and John Thune (R-SD), agree that Obama is handling the situation well.

 

Be Blessed

 
7 helpful answers

look past the cover

The people of Iran don't want the US stepping in, it's there battle to fight for. They will become a stronger people if they do this themselves, if the US steps in then it will only cause more turmoil in the Middle East. It would be a good if the people organized underground make proper plans to overthrow the dictator.

Posted 2009-06-25T13:55:17Z
adina was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

Helpful?(1)
Rated as Best Answer

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for r522robin? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Posts in Forums

Israel: One year prison anyone speaking against Israel's right to exist as...

Are affording full rights in Israel, while the Palestinian Arabs surrounding the settlements are not afforded voting rights in Israel nor freedom of movement. That is apartheid. Details: http

8 Gaza students lose U.S. grants after denied exit visas by Israel : Israel...

Of their families. I'm a strong supporter of Israel, and I'm as close to a Zionist as I can be without this fast, Israel and the US should be ashamed. [deleted]Because I believe in Israel's right to exist and their right to self-defense. I also

If Israel strikes Iran first should the U.S. help Israel?

No if Israel start a war they should fend for themselves with out U.S. help. It doesn't surprise me that you only got two Anti-Israel answers plus your own, could be more though. I have to say that if Israel does strike Iran, which I hope they do, I believe that the U.S.
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
Synonyms.net Q&A is powered by Yedda an AOL Company
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners
Home |  Add New Abbreviation |  Your List |  Tools |  Become an Editor |  Tell a Friend |  Links |  Awards |  Testimonials |  Press |  News |  APIs new! |  About
Copyright ©2004-2007 STANDS4 LLC. All rights reserved.  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us