Abbreviations.com Convert.net Definitions.net Quotes.net Synonyms.net USZip.net References.net
Bookmark & Share
 
Synonyms.net
Search for Synonyms:     
Browse Alphabetically:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z #
 random synonym 
Personalize Yedda, (And make Danny Happy)
People ask & answer about almost everything. Tell us what you're interested in... So we can personalize Yedda especially for you
I'm interested in:

Where was Home Land Security (Secretary Janet Napolitano) at the Fort Hood Incident?

Where was Home Land Security (Secretary Janet Napolitano) at the Fort Hood Incident?

Homeland Security’s Upside Down Reaction to Fort Hood

The U.S. Homeland Security secretary says she is working to prevent a possible wave of anti-Muslim sentiment after the shootings at Fort Hood in Texas.

Janet Napolitano says her agency is working with groups across the United States to try to deflect any backlash against American Muslims following Thursday’s rampage by Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan,…”

Response : The reaction of Secretary Napolitano, who happens to be in the UAE, to the Fort Hood shooting is to be concerned about negative reactions against Muslims.

We are in total agreement that Muslims in general should not be persecuted or blamed in any way because of the actions of one man. 

However, the fact is that there is no evidence that Muslims are going to be discriminated against because of the action of one bad guy. Rather than protecting the country from anymore possible home grown terrorists, Napolitano and the Obama administration proposes to increase political correctness instead and make American Muslims a protected class.

From all the reports that have come in over the last several days, Major Hasan was a devout Muslim who displayed some radical tendencies that had concerned his colleagues. He had received discipline for attempting to proselytize patients, made statements in conferences about beheading and pouring oil down non-Muslims, and radical comments on Islamist websites concerning suicide bombers. He had also made it quite clear to fellow officers that he opposed American troops occupying Muslim countries like in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

It is obvious that ‘political correctness’ led to this incident in the first place. So much was ignored and discounted as Hasan continued to be promoted in spite of considerable evidence concerning his radical Islamist attitudes. In the context of his medical and Army career, all of his radical religious tendencies were ignored and served up to the cause of tolerance and correctness.

Rather than calling for officials in the government and the Army to make sure that the country is secure from similar attacks. Rather than devising new investigative procedures that would vet anyone else serving in the military with similar attitudes or radical tendencies. The Sec. of supposed Homeland Security proposes to turn the whole thing upside down and make all Muslims in general a new class of official victims to be protected at all costs.

by Dr. D ~ November 8th, 2009


WASHINGTON - MAY 13:  U.S. Secretary of Homela...


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

2 Posted Answers
Order by

 
4 helpful answers

Be the change you wish to see in the world.  Ghandi

Come on Dr. D, I thought Janet Napolitano was head of the Middle Eastern Anti Defamation Department!  I mean, why on earth would we have a Homeland Security Department because there are NO such thing as terrorists?  Oh that's right, she's there to protect us against our own military.  It was a joke when they first started saying that, but it is no joke any longer.  With the current policies on terroism, terrorists, discrimination against Muslims, etc. they have stopped all the right policies and now our own military is being infiltrated by the likes of Major Hassan.  Who was it that said "America will destroy it'self from the inside out"?

Posted 2009-11-16T23:20:42Z
Jade was invited by Yedda to answer this question.

Helpful?(1)
Rated as Best Answer
 
132 helpful answers

Hurt me once
 
Shame on you!
 
Hurt me twice
 
Shame on me!
 

"GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS"

 

 




"THIS WAS IN MY MAIL TODAY"
 
"Thank you for Your Time"
 
Good Morning Friends,


As I watched the President spinning his lies across China a thought occurred to me.


Remember when you were a kid and you went to the amusement park. They always had the game Whack-A-Mole. My oldest son used to love the game. He called it Whack-A-Mole-E.  If you remember, you would put a quarter into the machine, these little moles would pop their head out of the hole, and you would proceed to knock the hell out of em with this rubber mallet. Great game! In my humble opinion, better the Skee Ball.


Someone needs to event the game, Whack-A-Liar. Can you picture putting a quarter into the machine, (I guess today it would be a dollar), and instead of a mole popping his pointy little head up, it would be an elected official. With all of the electronic advancements we have achieved today, the official would spout his rhetoric. At which point you could proceed to Whack-A-Liar. Knock the hell out of him.


Picture Obama popping up and saying, "No Public Option." Whack!!!!!


Biden saying, "The Stimulus is working." Whack, Whack


Or Pelosi just popping up and opening her mouth. Whack, Whack, Whack, WHACK!!!!


In fairness it will be a non partisan game with lots of little "Whack-A-Liar" heads. Endless heads.


Think about it. The game would be invigorating, stress relieving, and would keep a fair amount of Americans out of the hospital due to stroke. They could actually act out their aggressions.


On a more serious note, one needs to ask the question, "What does the game Whack-A-Liar and our elected officials have in common? The answer, MONEY. Your money. It takes a dollar to play the game, and the official needs your dollar to feed his agenda. Your money allows both games to be played.


 If things continue on present course, Americans are going to come to a cross road. The directional sign at the cross road is going to point in two directions. One direction is "Freedom", the other is "Socialism" The choice to be made is simple That in order to maintain Freedom we have to kill the Moles/Liars in power. We are going to come to the realization that there is only one way to rid ourselves of the beast. That there is no sword, no gun, no cannon available to stop them. I say that, but the Taliban and a nuke would not be out of the realm of thought, but that's for another conversation. The only weapon that Americans have is their MONEY. Some would say that the VOTE is a weapon, but to vote one liar out of office, and then replace him with another just ain't cutting it. So let's stick with MONEY as the weapon of choice. It is the true life blood of these guys. We all remember the first Tea Party, and we are now living through the second. Different time, but the SAME PRINCIPLE. Feeding the King. Feeding the President. Sound familiar? WHACK, WHACK, WHACK!


Money is the food that feeds the Moles/Liars. It is what keeps them alive, it is what they relie upon to sustain life.


The point is simple. The principle is sound. STOP FEEDING THE MOLES/LIARS, AND THEY WILL DIE.


I saw Bill Oriely interviewing a liberal last night. Sally somebody, the name is not important. This loon was calling for a 70% tax on the wealthy. Hello?? Is anyone home?? MORE FOOD! These idiots not only want to eat, but if allowed, they will GORGE. They will gorge until their belly's burst. They will strip the shelves bare, and leave America groveling in the dirt. Think I'm kidding? Look at our national debt. They are gorging as we speak.


To think that if I go out and bust my ass, risk it all, and make what is considered a WEALTHY living, that I am supposed to give 70% to the idiots in Washington. That's ludicrous. It is contrary to the principles that made America great. It is, to say the least, NOT AMERICAN. Call it what it what it really is, SOCIALISM!


So the next time you hear the words TAX REVOLT, don't dismiss the words as the words of a crazy person. They may become the words of TRUE Americans? Think about the meaning of the words, but more so, think about the potential effect! Then ask yourself the question, is it a viable option? WHACK,WHACK,WHACK!! You damn tooting it is.
                                                                                                                                                                       Our Forefathers had the balls to say the words. "Taxation without representation." The question is, when the time comes, will we?? Or, will the sand be a pillow for our heads?




B.


Sign in to participate

Got an answer for Fair And Balanced? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

Where is President Obama's Home Land Security?

Where is President Obama's Home Land Security? Taliban promises repeat of Fort Hood massacre: report The Taliban claimed there ...
Submitted by Fair And Balanced   11 days ago.
  • viewed 108 times
Last answer posted 3 days ago by Sweet Gypsey


Q:

Seeking advise on legal action against law enforcement

Hello, I have a question regarding a legal issue. My ex-boyfriend was recently charged with malicious destruction of my home and ...
Submitted by mom of 3   11 days ago.
  • viewed 42 times
Last answer posted 10 days ago by lawbug


Q:

Wouldn't a law with some real consequences do more than giving up the very freedoms so many have died for?

I think that the answer here is not giving up any of our Constitutional Rights, but focus our efforts on passing stiffer laws and ...
Submitted by sibervik1   1 month ago.
  • viewed 53 times
Last answer posted 28 days ago by Askinglaw



» More...

Explore Related Posts in Forums

Is politics on its own wothwhile? Or should I keep to History and Politics...

Is politics on its own wothwhile? Or should I keep to History and Politics? Advise me please. Re: Is politics on its own wothwhile? Or should I keep to History and Politics? Entirely depends really... not that you should choose a course or uni based on purely that.Re: Is politics on its own

If one chooses to engage in politics, and I am as fascinated by it as anyone...

Wow. What a neat, tidy argument. Politics is about power, therefore it's dominated by sociopaths Wow. What a neat, tidy argument. Politics is about power, therefore it's dominated by sociopaths. Makes sense. I'm a sociopath, now? Cool.What part of gummint do you work for?The voting constituency!Cheers. That leaves me out.

AS Politics Thread 08-10

AS Politics Thread 08-10 Anyone taking Govt. and Politics this year. I'm on Edexcel :) Re: AS Politics Thread 08-10 I just started A2, so good luck to all ASers! If anyone wants any : AS Politics Thread 08-10 Just started it today, what kinda questions would be expected on the final exam?Re
» More...
Powered by
Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
Synonyms.net Q&A is powered by Yedda an AOL Company
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners
Home |  Add New Abbreviation |  Your List |  Tools |  Become an Editor |  Tell a Friend |  Links |  Awards |  Testimonials |  Press |  News |  APIs new! |  About
Copyright ©2004-2007 STANDS4 LLC. All rights reserved.  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us