Abbreviations.com Convert.net Definitions.net Quotes.net Synonyms.net USZip.net References.net
Bookmark & Share
 
Synonyms.net
Search for Synonyms:     
Browse Alphabetically:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z #
 random synonym 
Personalize Yedda, (And make Danny Happy)
People ask & answer about almost everything. Tell us what you're interested in... So we can personalize Yedda especially for you
I'm interested in:

Man is blind until they "know thyselves", and to know oneself truly, one must painstakingly analyze their beliefs, and uncover beliefs they operate under without conscious awareness.  Only then does one have the freedom to exercise their Will with wisdom.

Creationism & Darwinism, 2 theories that ARE compatible

Why is it that no one has considered, or at least expressed the possibility that Creationism and Darwin's theories do not conflict with one another, due to the fact that Creationism explains how matter was formed in the first place (and I do believe that God created the materials from which developed our cosmos), and from there, natural selection and evolution became a physical law of the "reality" created by God?  In my humble opinion, Man may ver well have evolved from monkeys, apes, whatever.  But a human being is endowed with something that no other living creature or thing has:  conscious self-awareness and the ability to reason, a "divine gift" that has enabled humans alone to advance and evolve and exercize their Will in a world with the conscious intention of evolving to higher and higher planes of awareness, intellect, knowledge, wisdom and growth.

Is this not a natural perception or at the very least, a natural observation that an intellectual man consider?? 


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

5 Posted Answers
Order by

 
7 helpful answers

After thinking a lot about this (I have also asked questions simlilar to this one), I can't come up with anything better than that it was a coincidence. This coincidence may perhaps be Mendels achievements being emphasized in the wrong way by many of Darwins followers. ... I mean that Mendel's described heredity does tend to be somewhat more mechanical in it's nature than could it be a clever thing to say we wouldn't all have to be mechanically interested in worldly hopes and despairs.

In other words, the poor old Monk that Mendel was, had not been intuitively very christian in his research. The unchristian tendency was not strong enough, though, for him not to have his theories be published too effectively. Once discovered by the English academics, they stood for that evolution would have to be mechanical. That's my guess about this morbid tendency to be too materialstic about heredity.

Posted 2009-07-16T08:23:19Z
 
2 helpful answers

Man is blind until they "know thyselves", and to know oneself truly, one must painstakingly analyze their beliefs, and uncover beliefs they operate under without conscious awareness.  Only then does one have the freedom to exercise their Will with wisdom.

There is no such thing as coincidence.  We only believe such a phenomenon exists because we are oblivious of the correlation between events we perceive, and the connections made that tie one event to the other or others.

The events that occur at the sub-atomic levels follow the same laws of the physical universe, but as we are just on the brink of discovery and awareness at this level, we have yet to put all the pieces together to be able to understand how what is unseen becomes visibly observable in it's physical manifestation.

This process occurs despite and regardless of scientic facts, beliefs (either religious or other), disbelief, etc.  Natural laws operate dependent of human's awareness or belief in it.

Renée

Posted 2009-07-16T08:39:48Z
 
277 helpful answers

 Be Thankful

 Speak softly

 Let your love shine...

Is this not a natural perception or at the very least, a natural observation that an intellectual man consider??

yes, renee, makes sense to me.  njoy

Posted 2009-07-19T20:32:14Z
 
277 helpful answers

 Be Thankful

 Speak softly

 Let your love shine...

either religious or other), disbelief, etc.  Natural laws operate dependent of human's awareness or belief in it.   

Hi Renee, did you mean to say INdependent here in this sentence?  njoy

Posted 2009-07-19T20:35:39Z
Helpful?(1)
Rated as Best Answer
 
2 helpful answers

Man is blind until they "know thyselves", and to know oneself truly, one must painstakingly analyze their beliefs, and uncover beliefs they operate under without conscious awareness.  Only then does one have the freedom to exercise their Will with wisdom.

*blushes* Darn, but I hate making such simple mistake when I am expressing my intellectual perceptions. Indeed, I did mean "..independent of..."

Thanks for the feedback.

 

Posted 2009-07-21T02:13:33Z

Sign in to participate

Got an answer for Renee? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
Synonyms.net Q&A is powered by Yedda an AOL Company
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners
Home |  Add New Abbreviation |  Your List |  Tools |  Become an Editor |  Tell a Friend |  Links |  Awards |  Testimonials |  Press |  News |  APIs new! |  About
Copyright ©2004-2007 STANDS4 LLC. All rights reserved.  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us