Is Barak Obama a Messiah or Malkhytzedek ...

None of the above.  He is just a human being trying to straighten out a big mess that was given to him with his new job.  This mess wasn't created in a day don't expect it to be changed in a day.

Barrack Obama is not a matter of concern in the Bible: he is merely an usurper as was Pontius Pilate.  The antichrist has come and gone: that was Hitller. 

Obama is merely a political misfit of the Democrat party.

Not to worry: in four years, even the most strident Democrat will vote Republican, as they did with Bush and Reagan.

no not the messiah, but i think god is workin in a magnificent way thru him to help his (gods) people

I hope not. Our country was founded on seperation of church and state and if it turned out the president was some form of diety this would clearly be grounds for impeachment.

I beg to differ with you about your phrasing morethan1. It is not serperation of church and state.  This is not in the Constitution. It was in a letter that was written by Thomas Jefferson in this way ... seperation of church from state. ... The framers of the Constitution did not want to have the government establish a state run church.

Now as to answer the question. The Messiah will not be born of a woman again. He will return the same way He went into heaven. This is what the angels told the apostles in Acts 1:10-11.

Rocmike3, Hitler was a type of the antichrist. The Antichrist will be born and will offer peace to Israel; not the destruction of her people. Yet that will only last for 3 1/2 years and the desicration of the 3rd temple will occur. I know that the true church will not be here at the start of the tribulation period.

Hey Mack! Guess what? When you can get, well first on the Supreme Court, and get four other Justices to agree with you, which they never have, that Church and State aren't seperate then your absolutely going to be right!

Until then you are absolutely wrong. Check your Bill or Rights that was demanded by the signers of the Constitution to get their signatures on it. The Supreme Court has.

They don't share your oppinion and neither do I.

Israel and Iran are theocracies, you might enjoy one of them better. Have a nice trip.

To the posted question, none.  Why would you even consider Pres. Obama to be the messiah?  He's the President of the USA, nothing more or less.  He wanted the job, now he's got it and he's got his hands full.  I hope he can find solutions to our many problems, and find a way to regain the economic prosperity we once enjoyed.

As to the comments by Mack and morethan1, you're both wrong.  The Supreme Court's definition is based not on the Bill of Rights, which contains the phrase "separation of Church and State", but the 1st Ammendment that states there will be no State Sponsored Religion, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;".  This is the Constitution by which all laws are measured against.  For morethan1, I don't know what country you're from, but our Country was founded on the Constitution of the United States of America, and at that time it had 10 Ammendments that defined the laws of our land.  There was not a specific reason given amongst the founding fathers that stated our Country needed to be borne to realize "seperation of Church and State".

tonygs,

I thank you for what you have written. You are right about what the Constitution says but I have heard other places that the phrase separation of church from state was something that Jefferson questioned. He was not sure that it would be good for this country to have a State Church as in England. I do think I have the wrong time frame though.

This may have been what caused our framers to state "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"

I always like to be educated. I really do appreciate your correction. I will have to see if I can find when and where Thomas Jefferson had written this letter to that contained the phrase I used.