Abbreviations.com Convert.net Definitions.net Quotes.net Synonyms.net USZip.net References.net
Bookmark & Share
 
Synonyms.net
Search for Synonyms:     
Browse Alphabetically:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z #
 random synonym 
Personalize Yedda, (And make Danny Happy)
People ask & answer about almost everything. Tell us what you're interested in... So we can personalize Yedda especially for you
I'm interested in:

60% Want Fort Hood Investigated as Terrorist Act


60% Want Fort Hood Investigated as Terrorist Act

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/november_2009/60_want_fort_hood_shooting_investigated_as_terrorist_act

Sixty percent (60%) of likely voters nationwide say last week's shootings at Fort Hood should be investigated by military authorities as a terrorist act.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 27% want the incident investigated by civilian authorities as a criminal act. Another 13% are not sure.

Those following the story Very Closely are even more likely to want the shooting investigated as an act of terrorism.

Sixty-five percent (65%) of all voters say Major Nidal Malik Hasan should receive the death penalty if convicted. Nineteen percent (19%) disagree, and 16% aren't sure.

Seventy-six percent (76%) believe the army should remove from duty all officers like Hasan who attempt to contact radical terrorist organizations such as al Qaeda. Only seven percent (7%) disagree. This general view was articulated by Senator Joseph Lieberman, who said, "If Hasan was showing signs, saying to people that he had become an Islamist extremist, the U.S. Army has to have a zero tolerance."

"There were definitely clear indications that Hasan's loyalties were not with America," Lt. Col. Val Finnell, a classmate of Hasan's for two years at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Md., said in news reports.

While voters overwhelmingly support the idea of removing a soldier who has attempted to contact terror groups, 57% also are at least somewhat concerned that the incident at Fort Hood will prompt a backlash against Muslims serving in the military. Twenty-three percent (23%) are very concerned. Forty percent (40%) are not very or not at all concerned about such a backlash.

Interest in the story is high with 47% of voters following it Very Closely and another 36% following it Somewhat Closely.

Not surprisingly, there are significant partisan differences in response to the shooting. Republicans and voters not affiliated with either major party overwhelmingly believe that Hasan’s shooting spree should be investigated as an act of terrorism. Democrats are evenly divided as to whether the murders should be handled as a terrorist act or a criminal act.

By a 48% to 33% margin, liberals want the matter investigated as a criminal act. Seventy-seven percent (77%) of conservatives favor investigating the Fort Hood shootings as a terrorist act.

Seventy-two percent (72%) of Democrats are at least somewhat concerned that the shooting will prompt a backlash against Muslims in the military. Roughly half of Republican and unaffiliated voters share that concern.

As on many issues, there is a wide gap between the Political Class and Mainstream Americans. Sixty-nine percent (69%) of Mainstream Americans want the shooting investigated as a terrorist act while 51% of the Political Class want civilian authorities to handle it as a criminal investigation.


Share Send to a friend Watch Report
 
 

2 Posted Answers
Order by

 
1007 helpful answers

Lets play ball JoeAnimated MonkeysThrow the ball back Biden

 

 

dang him dang him they oughta take a rope and hang him ,hangs him fron the highest tree America don't you weep for himmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Helpful?(1)
Rated as Best Answer
 
132 helpful answers

Hurt me once
 
Shame on you!
 
Hurt me twice
 
Shame on me!
 

"GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS"

 

 




"THIS WAS IN MY MAIL TODAY"
 
"Thank you for Your Time"
 
Good Morning Friends,


As I watched the President spinning his lies across China a thought occurred to me.


Remember when you were a kid and you went to the amusement park. They always had the game Whack-A-Mole. My oldest son used to love the game. He called it Whack-A-Mole-E.  If you remember, you would put a quarter into the machine, these little moles would pop their head out of the hole, and you would proceed to knock the hell out of em with this rubber mallet. Great game! In my humble opinion, better the Skee Ball.


Someone needs to event the game, Whack-A-Liar. Can you picture putting a quarter into the machine, (I guess today it would be a dollar), and instead of a mole popping his pointy little head up, it would be an elected official. With all of the electronic advancements we have achieved today, the official would spout his rhetoric. At which point you could proceed to Whack-A-Liar. Knock the hell out of him.


Picture Obama popping up and saying, "No Public Option." Whack!!!!!


Biden saying, "The Stimulus is working." Whack, Whack


Or Pelosi just popping up and opening her mouth. Whack, Whack, Whack, WHACK!!!!


In fairness it will be a non partisan game with lots of little "Whack-A-Liar" heads. Endless heads.


Think about it. The game would be invigorating, stress relieving, and would keep a fair amount of Americans out of the hospital due to stroke. They could actually act out their aggressions.


On a more serious note, one needs to ask the question, "What does the game Whack-A-Liar and our elected officials have in common? The answer, MONEY. Your money. It takes a dollar to play the game, and the official needs your dollar to feed his agenda. Your money allows both games to be played.


 If things continue on present course, Americans are going to come to a cross road. The directional sign at the cross road is going to point in two directions. One direction is "Freedom", the other is "Socialism" The choice to be made is simple That in order to maintain Freedom we have to kill the Moles/Liars in power. We are going to come to the realization that there is only one way to rid ourselves of the beast. That there is no sword, no gun, no cannon available to stop them. I say that, but the Taliban and a nuke would not be out of the realm of thought, but that's for another conversation. The only weapon that Americans have is their MONEY. Some would say that the VOTE is a weapon, but to vote one liar out of office, and then replace him with another just ain't cutting it. So let's stick with MONEY as the weapon of choice. It is the true life blood of these guys. We all remember the first Tea Party, and we are now living through the second. Different time, but the SAME PRINCIPLE. Feeding the King. Feeding the President. Sound familiar? WHACK, WHACK, WHACK!


Money is the food that feeds the Moles/Liars. It is what keeps them alive, it is what they relie upon to sustain life.


The point is simple. The principle is sound. STOP FEEDING THE MOLES/LIARS, AND THEY WILL DIE.


I saw Bill Oriely interviewing a liberal last night. Sally somebody, the name is not important. This loon was calling for a 70% tax on the wealthy. Hello?? Is anyone home?? MORE FOOD! These idiots not only want to eat, but if allowed, they will GORGE. They will gorge until their belly's burst. They will strip the shelves bare, and leave America groveling in the dirt. Think I'm kidding? Look at our national debt. They are gorging as we speak.


To think that if I go out and bust my ass, risk it all, and make what is considered a WEALTHY living, that I am supposed to give 70% to the idiots in Washington. That's ludicrous. It is contrary to the principles that made America great. It is, to say the least, NOT AMERICAN. Call it what it what it really is, SOCIALISM!


So the next time you hear the words TAX REVOLT, don't dismiss the words as the words of a crazy person. They may become the words of TRUE Americans? Think about the meaning of the words, but more so, think about the potential effect! Then ask yourself the question, is it a viable option? WHACK,WHACK,WHACK!! You damn tooting it is.
                                                                                                                                                                       Our Forefathers had the balls to say the words. "Taxation without representation." The question is, when the time comes, will we?? Or, will the sand be a pillow for our heads?




B.


Sign in to participate

Got an answer for Fair And Balanced? Would you like to comment on the posted answers, or vote for the one which you think is the best?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

Explore Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:


Q:

If Nidal Malik Hasan's had a bomb strapped on him and killed 13 soldiers and wounded 29 would you then call him a terrorist?

If Nidal Malik Hasan's Fort Hood (jihad terrorist) had a bomb strapped on him and killed 13 soldiers and wounded 29 would ...
Submitted by American Patriot   11 days ago.
  • viewed 387 times
Last answer posted 1 day ago by finabiscotti


Q:

Where was Home Land Security (Secretary Janet Napolitano) at the Fort Hood Incident?

Where was Home Land Security (Secretary Janet Napolitano) at the Fort Hood Incident? Homeland Security’s Upside Down Reaction to ...
Submitted by Fair And Balanced   11 days ago.
  • viewed 121 times
Last answer posted 3 days ago by Sweet Gypsey


Q:

Ft, hood jobs

I am retired from the u. S. Army (1997) and i'm planning to relocate near fort hood, if any employment in base?
Submitted by Luis r. Encarnacion   1 year ago.
  • viewed 164 times



» More...

Feed - Subscribe to changes to this Q&A Blog
ADVERTISEMENT
Synonyms.net Q&A is powered by Yedda an AOL Company
Copyright © 2006-2009, Yedda Inc. and respective copyright owners
Home |  Add New Abbreviation |  Your List |  Tools |  Become an Editor |  Tell a Friend |  Links |  Awards |  Testimonials |  Press |  News |  APIs new! |  About
Copyright ©2004-2007 STANDS4 LLC. All rights reserved.  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us